![]() ![]() Congress gathers facts and evidence about the problem at hand when it exercises its oversight authority. Constitution, the oversight power is inherent to its ability to legislate, hold the executive branch accountable, and inform the public on critical issues. Derived from Congress’s enumerated powers listed in Article III of the U.S. The power of the United States Congress to conduct oversight activities is fundamental to its capacity to govern responsibly and competently. Part III assesses current scholarship on potentially viable measures of effective congressional oversight. Part II discusses the potential benefits of best practices research on capacity and how effectiveness measures enable this approach. Part I describes the relationship between sufficient capacity and effective congressional oversight, as well as the origins of Congress’s capacity problem. Simply put, best practices need best measures. Successfully fostering oversight capacity through best practices requires mature, trustworthy measurement. Measures of effective congressional oversight would assist in this regard, but scholarship in this area is nascent. However, researching best practices depends on reliably identifying the most effective congressional investigations. This essay argues that identifying best oversight practices would alleviate this trend’s impact by cultivating an internal knowledge base. Prominent among these issues are staff turnover and subsequent “wip out” of oversight expertise that occurs when experienced staffers depart. Congress faces recurring institutional challenges that hinder its capacity to conduct effective oversight investigations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |